La'o Hamutuk Annual Report
Calendar year 2008
La’o Hamutuk (“Walking Together” in English) is a Timor-Leste organization that monitors, analyzes and reports on the principal international institutions present in Timor-Leste as they relate to the physical, economic and social development of the country. La’o Hamutuk believes that the people of Timor-Leste must be the ultimate decision-makers in this democratic process.
La’o Hamutuk is an independent organization which works to facilitate effective Timorese participation in the reconstruction and development of the country. In addition, La’o Hamutuk works to improve communication between the international community and Timor-Leste’s people, facilitating cooperation and solidarity. Finally, La’o Hamutuk is a resource center, providing literature on conventional and alternative development models, experiences and practices.
Since our founding in 2000, La’o Hamutuk has had a policy to preserve our ability to monitor institutions objectively, as well as to avoid perceptions that we might be influenced by funders. We do not accept grants from donors with significant interests in Timor-Leste, such as the United Nations and its agencies, the World Bank, ADB, IMF, major donors to Timor-Leste, the Timor-Leste government and political parties, and companies operating here. We rely on private foundations, NGOs, governments of small countries, and individual donations.
La’o Hamutuk’s six Timor-Leste and two international staff have equal responsibilities and receive the same pay and benefits. We are committed to equal representation for women among our staff, which currently includes three women and five men, as well as two male security and support staff. Our Advisory Board includes three Timor-Leste people active in civil society and three internationals, former La’o Hamutuk staff who remain closely involved with Timor-Leste.
Indonesia’s 24-year occupation of Timor-Leste was horrific, taking the lives of more than 100,000 Timor-Leste people. In 1999, the Indonesian military launched a wave of terror and devastation before and after the referendum. In response, the international community established the United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor (UNTAET). On 20 May 2002, sovereignty passed from the UN to Timor-Leste’s government, but foreign governments, international financial institutions and multinational corporations continue in major roles.
During the years after 1999, international organizations provided resources and expertise, but coordination was often poor, with international workers insensitive to local needs and capabilities. Some decisions were poorly thought through and have returned to haunt Timor-Leste.
Timor-Leste has received more international aid per person than any other recent post-conflict country, but the results are hard to see. More than three billion dollars have been spent and international advisors are widespread, but much remains unreconstructed and massive skills shortages remain. The international community has failed to fulfill its promise to end impunity for crimes against humanity.
In 2006, Timor-Leste confronted a multidimensional crisis, a consequence of centuries of colonization, occupation and the uncompleted process of self-determination. Another outbreak occurred in February 2008, with the near-fatal shooting of the President Jose Ramos-Horta and an attack on the Prime Minister. A temporary ‘State of Siege’ was then imposed, including a nightly curfew and a joint police-military command with larger authority to maintain law and order. The government and international agencies increased their focus on security and the priority of getting people displaced in 2006 to return home. By year-end, most had, but poverty, unemployment, lack of accountability, class divisions and anxiety continue.
It will take at least a generation for the legacy of trauma, violence, war, impunity and lack of experience with self-government to evolve into peaceful stability under the democratic rule of law, and La’o Hamutuk continues to support this evolution.
Democratic processes have not consolidated as much as people had hoped. Notwithstanding the successful election and peaceful transfer of power in 2007, Parliamentary and other political debates are often polarized along party lines, focusing on rhetoric rather than substance, often excluding people outside the capital. When the weak judicial system holds government accountable, a judge is fired. Public officials often conceal specifics about government plans and projects (although La’o Hamutuk circulates some of these). A journalist who writes about corruption is charged with defamation, and rhetoric or gestures often substitute for substance. Nevertheless, La’o Hamutuk itself has not experienced any threats or sanctions, and we continue to help people understand the policies of international and Timor-Leste institutions.
In December 2007, Timor-Leste’s Parliament approved a $348 million annual budget for 2008. For the first time, the Government decided to spend the entire Estimated Sustainable Income from the Petroleum Fund, $294 million. In June 2008, Parliament enacted a Tax Reform Law, drastically cutting import, business and wage taxes. In July, the Government enacted a mid-year rectified budget with a 126% increase in expenditures, totaling $778 million, planning to withdraw $687 million from the Petroleum Fund. In October, the Court of Appeals ruled that parts of the budget were illegal and unconstitutional, limiting expenditures to $602 million. Not to be deterred, the Government proposed a 2009 budget of $681 million in December. The Petroleum Fund will provide $589 million of this, even though oil income during 2009 will be less than half of 2008, which saw the peak of production from the only operating oil and gas field.
During 2008, the Government signed several MOUs with international companies in the agrofuels and petroleum sectors, keeping many of them secret. Massive imports of rice undermine local agriculture, and Timor-Leste’s total imports are 20 times as much as its non-oil exports.
However, Timor-Leste continues to progress from foreign occupation to democratic self-government, from resistance to rule of law, from aid dependency to economic self-sufficiency. Nevertheless, the country’s situation is perilous, and current government policies are often grounded in nationalist rhetoric and alleviating short-term demands. The government dreams of an affluent Timor-Leste supported by foreign investment, but La’o Hamutuk fears that dependence on transient oil revenues and food imports could worsen economic hardship and lead to civil unrest when the money runs out in a decade or two – a classic case of the “resource curse.”
La’o Hamutuk’s radio program reaches every district; our Bulletin has a circulation larger than any newspaper; our website receives 5,000 accesses every day; our global connections have no parallel in Timor-Leste. Our work helps develop knowledge and confidence in the stability and openness of the political system, so that everyone can participate in the development of the nation. People in Timor-Leste civil society, government, and international agencies tell us that La’o Hamutuk is essential, and we expect to continue for many years.
The principal objective of La’o Hamutuk is to increase the Timor-Leste people’s knowledge and participation in the development of their country. We implement this with these Strategic Goals:
Our main work is to research, monitor and analyze international institutions and global systems which affect people here. We disseminate the results through several tools:
Our findings are published in the La’o Hamutuk Bulletin in English (circulation 1,500) and Tetum (circulation 2,500 - larger than any of Timor-Leste’s newspapers). The Bulletin is distributed free to the public, as well as to schools, churches, government offices, and NGOs throughout Timor-Leste. Within Dili, we distribute to embassies, IFIs, the UN, government offices, hotels, restaurants, libraries, and other public places. The Bulletin is also circulated by email and posted on our website.
Since 2000, we have published 39 Bulletins, ranging from eight to 24 pages. Each has a main topic, a few other articles, reports from activities and editorials. During 2008, we published three Bulletins:
We also published a 130-page book Sunrise LNG in Timor-Leste: Dreams, Realities and Challenges in both English and Bahasa Indonesia. We also produced a Tetum popular version and PowerPoint presentation. They are available on paper, our website and CD-ROM.
La’o Hamutuk produces many other reports and analyses, circulated privately and publicly. We write submissions and letters, or give oral testimony, to legislatures and other policy-makers. We often lead coalition lobbying efforts, and were chosen to represent the NGO community at the 2008 Development Partner’s Meeting. UNDP commissioned La’o Hamutuk to write a background paper for their forthcoming National Human Development Report; they and others sometimes nominate La’o Hamutuk to represent Timor-Leste civil society at local and international conferences.
La’o Hamutuk’s website http://www.laohamutuk.org includes many La’o Hamutuk reports, statements, analysis and press releases, as well as those from coalitions and organizations we work with, totaling more than 2,600 documents.
A topic index makes it easy for researchers to find material many specific issues, such as Justice and Human Rights, Oil and Natural Gas, Global Trade and Markets, Timor-Leste Government Finances, Aid to Timor-Leste, United Nations, Militarization and War, and Agriculture.
People access more than 5,000 pages on our website every day. During the past year, the readership has more than doubled, becoming the principal global source of information on issues as diverse as the State Budget and Petroleum Fund, agrofuels projects, the proposed Heavy Oil electric power plants, Development Partners Meetings, and UN reports and resolutions related to Timor-Leste.
The map shows where users of our website are, and the size of each pink circle is the number of readers.
In addition to advocating transparency, we implement it. Our website and list emails circulate and explain essential documents like the government budget, program, draft legislation and UN agreements, even when the responsible agency has not published them.
Responding to many requests, we translated the principal pages into both Tetum and English during 2008, and post new items in both languages. We also added podcasts (audio files) of some Radio Igualidade programs.
La’o Hamutuk maintains an email list with around 175 subscribers. In addition, we circulate many of our materials to other lists and information sharing networks, reaching thousands. Our online materials are frequently picked up by other websites, new outlets and bloggers; Google Alerts found new references to “La’o Hamutuk” on news and blog sites (not including our own website) more than 50 times during the last six months.
Radio is the most effective medium to reach most people in Timor-Leste. La’o Hamutuk’s program Radio Igualidade is broadcast in Tetum every Sunday on the national radio station, RTL, which has transmitters across the country, as well on community radio stations in Viqueque and Oecussi, reaching many listeners who have no other access to the information in our broadcasts. La’o Hamutuk staff discuss topical issues with knowledgeable guests, often presenting diverse views.
We began posting podcasts of Radio Igualidade to our website at the end of 2008, in order to reach an international audience.
lists the 35 programs La’o Hamutuk produced and broadcast during 2008.
La’o Hamutuk public meetings bring together people from government, international institutions, media and civil society to discuss and debate key policy issues. Decision-makers, including Ministers and heads of international agencies here, appreciate these opportunities to engage with the public, and citizens and civil society organizations use them to inform and express themselves.
La’o Hamutuk staff often give talks or serve on panels at public events and conferences organized by other organizations and institutions. During 2008, we purchased a projector, screen and generator to present more effectively, especially in rural areas. Over the past year, we have shared our knowledge and research by providing trainings, including for the Core Group on Transparency, the NGO Forum, and the International Center For Journalists. We expect to continue and expand these activities, some of which provide income to La’o Hamutuk.
The 15 public meetings La’o Hamutuk organized during 2008 are listed in, as are the events when La’o Hamutuk staff was invited to speak to other organizations.
Our resource center includes books and audiovisual materials in several languages which students and visitors can use, as well as to inform our own research. Our internal computer “intranet” includes hundreds of documents, websites and reports, helping to overcome difficulties with internet access. When we move to our new office, hopefully during 2009, we will purchase new materials and equipment to make the center (including audio-visual materials) more accessible and useful to our own staff, students, international researchers, activists and others.
Media is very important for advocacy, and La’o Hamutuk frequently gives interviews or provides information to visiting journalists or those who contact us. During 2008, we provided training for journalists on budget issues, and continued to augment and strengthen our relationships with reporters, in addition to writing more articles to publish in local newspapers.
During 2008, La’o Hamutuk was on Timor-Leste radio and television more than a dozen times, and reported on in local newspapers more often. We were cited by media outside Timor-Leste more than 16 times. A partial list of articles by or referencing La’o Hamutuk is in.
Our research takes a holistic approach, looking at issues strategically and exploring how international systems and institutions interact with them. We also actively engage and respond to policy development processes, including legislation and contracting. Monitoring donor projects remains part of our work, but our scope is broader than the assumptions made by the donor, and we focus on systems and policies rather than individual wrongdoing.
In addressing an issue, we consult with local and international experts, as well as people directly encountering the impacts and/or working to alleviate them Timor-Leste and elsewhere, making special efforts to look at the consequences for and perspectives of women and rural people. We also provide information on alternative models to those currently available here.
La’o Hamutuk tries to include a gender perspective in all our work, as women are often discriminated against by both Timor-Leste society and international agencies. Although we don’t have a separate gender research area, we explore the impacts of policies and programs on women and children. During 2008, Yasinta Lujina participated in workshops on empowering the Women’s Movement, in Indonesia in June and in South Africa in December. In early 2009, La’o Hamutuk received a United Nations Award in recognition of our “leadership and dedication in promoting gender equality and the empowerment of the women of Timor-Leste.”
We organize our monitoring and advocacy into four principal areas:
La’o Hamutuk has three-person teams working on Agriculture and on Natural Resources, as well as one person on Governance. Our Economics and some Governance work is shared among people on other teams. We hope to fill out the Governance team and to create a separate Economics team during 2009. If recruitment succeeds beyond expectations, we will start another team to monitor Service Delivery (health, education, communications, water, electricity, etc.).
The rest of this section discusses work done during 2008; the results are summarized below.
Oil and gas production and sales are critical to Timor-Leste, comprising 83% of Gross National Income during 2008 and providing 98% of Government revenues. This dependency is likely to worsen in coming years, due to little non-oil economic development and escalating government expenditures (expenditures in the 2009 budget will be 96% higher than were planned for 2008). However, Timor-Leste’s oil revenues are dropping fast (2009 will be less than half of 2008), and we believe current policies are bringing Timor-Leste into the “resource curse” which damns nearly every other impoverished, oil-dependent country.
La’o Hamutuk has long been the leading organization in Timor-Leste providing information and alternatives for officials and civil society about these dangers and possible solutions. This includes not only revenue management and transparency, but also macroeconomic policy, effective regulation, and the environmental, social, political and economic dangers of petroleum dependency.
Our October 2008 strategic planning, we identified two fundamental objectives for this work:
1. Preventing the resource curse in Timor-Leste, which includes
2. Avoiding unjust and/or predatory relationships related to oil and gas exploitation.
Proposed Sunrise Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Plant
In 2006, La’o Hamutuk began to research the negative and positive impacts of a possible natural gas liquefaction plant in Timor-Leste, liquefying gas from the Greater Sunrise field and shipping it overseas. In February 2008 we published a 131-page report “Sunrise LNG in Timor-Leste: Dreams, Realities, and Challenges.” The report explains the economic, environmental and social risks and benefits of this facility for the Timorese people, and includes recommendations about what the government, oil companies and civil society should do to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks.
More than 115 people came to our 18 February book launch, including civil society, government officials, journalists, diplomats, and representatives of international institutions and oil companies. Secretary of State for Natural Resources Alfredo Pires spoke, and La’o Hamutuk presented our report. We later published the report in Bahasa Indonesia, and produced a popular version and slide presentation in Tetum, all of which are available on CD-ROM or for download. We use information from the report, sometimes simplified or updated, as the basis of many Bulletin articles and radio programs.
La’o Hamutuk has sold more than $500 worth of books and CD-ROMs, in addition to the 100 copies purchased by the Secretary of State for his staff. Public debate about an LNG plant in Timor-Leste has escalated, with much press attention. Although the debate sometimes lapses into polemics, nationalism and fantasy, La’o Hamutuk’s report provides a fact-based foundation.
In August, La’o Hamutuk took our findings to the people who will receive the primary impacts from this project – the communities where it may be built. We conducted workshops in Betano, Lore I, Los Palos, Beaçu and Viqueque, drawing large numbers of community people, local officials, police, media, NGO and church representatives. Every workshop drew at least 35 people. Especially in the coastal towns, participants said that they rarely receive balanced information, and that it was the first time an organization which researched in their area had returned to share their findings.
Sunrise operator Woodside Petroleum (which has had an exclusive contract since 1991) did its own study of development options, which it presented to Timor-Leste officials during the second quarter of 2008. Woodside concluded that an LNG plant in Timor-Leste was less profitable than building a floating one at sea or expanding the existing plant in Darwin. Woodside’s study includes deeper technical and economic analysis than La’o Hamutuk’s (theirs cost 100 times as much as ours), but omits some important aspects. Nevertheless, Woodside’s information and many of their conclusions support our findings, and nothing in their report contradicts our analysis.
During the first half of 2008, the RDTL Government signed undisclosed agreements with two Asian oil companies, bypassing normal tender processes. Petronas (Malaysia) and Korea Gas. Petronas has provided funding and technical expertise to a Task Force studying the feasibility of bringing the Sunrise gas pipeline to Timor-Leste. La’o Hamutuk staffer Santina Soares left us for a few months to join the Task Force, before heading off to graduate school in Thailand. The Task Force report was presented to the Prime Minister early in 2009, but its contents remain secret. Korea Gas paid for a detailed study of sea depths in the Timor Sea, necessary for pipeline design. Throughout the year, La’o Hamutuk publicly and privately urged that these agreements to be disclosed, asking for greater transparency and fact-based discussion in the LNG debate.
In December, the government invited us to a three-day pipeline engineering training with the Sunrise Task Force.
We have monitored the Petroleum Fund issue since it was first discussed five years ago. We continue to support the principles of intergenerational equity underlying the Petroleum Fund Act, to advocate for transparency and accountability, and to reiterate the risks of petroleum dependency.
The Banking and Payments Authority (BPA) has published 13 quarterly and two annual reports on the Petroleum Fund, and La’o Hamutuk has participated in every quarterly press conference, analyzing the report and posting them on our website.
In May, La’o Hamutuk learned that the Government intended to double the $348 million State Budget for 2008 in a “mid-year adjustment,” but we didn’t get details or confirmation until the Council of Ministers approved a 122% increase to $773 million on 18 June. The spending spree was to be financed by withdrawing money from the Petroleum Fund far above the Estimated Sustainable Income (ESI), which itself had been increased from the $294 million estimated in late 2007 to $396 million. This was the first time a Timor-Leste government had openly defied the principle that the nation’s non-renewable resource wealth should also benefit future generations.
La’o Hamutuk then took the lead in disseminating budget information and analysis, training civil society and helping write a coalition statement New Mid-Year Budget is First Step to Resource Curse. We sharply criticized the proposed $240 million Economic Stabilization Fund (ESF) to subsidize imported food, fuel and construction materials, which pushes Timor-Leste toward an import-dependent economy which will collapse when oil revenues wane. In a change from the tax reform debate (below), the World Bank and the IMF now agreed with La’o Hamutuk.
Although Parliament approved the mid-year budget increase despite these warnings, several MPs challenged it in court, using our arguments. On 13 November, the Court of Appeals ruled that the mid-year budget increase illegally violated the Petroleum Fund law by spending more than the Estimated Sustainable Income without adequate justification, and that the ESF was unconstitutional because it was hidden from Parliamentary oversight. We were not involved in the case but were first to publish the court’s decision, while local media covered the politics but not the substance. Officials’ defiant reactions undermined the rule of law (including firing the judge who wrote it), but we continued to focus on legal and constitutional issues. In the end, the government largely complied with the court’s ruling, primarily because they could not execute the huge increase in spending and because falling rice prices reduced the demand for subsidized imports.
In October, La’o Hamutuk was contracted by the International Center for Journalists to provide a week-long training to local media on how to read and analyze the budget documents. Our November Bulletin includes comprehensive analysis of budget issues, in preparation for the next cycle.
Sadly, the 2009 budget proposed in early December 2008 continued the same trajectory. We obtained the budget documents in English and Portuguese, and our website was the only public source of this information for more than a month. We analyzed the budget, which included another plan to spend above the ESI, which was re-estimated at $408 million, notwithstanding the crashing world oil price. Our submission to Parliament at year-end helped persuade the Budget Committee to unanimously reject exceeding the ESI, but the plenary overruled them and passed the $681 million budget largely unamended, spending $589 million from the Petroleum Fund.
The Prime Minister’s budget message promised “2009 and future spending levels to exceed the Estimate of Sustainable Income,” so we expect to increase our advocacy and the diversity of our allies in 2009 and beyond.
Before oil prices and stock markets started to crash, some in Government were suggesting that the Petroleum Fund rules should be revised to make it easier to spend money faster and to ease shifting Fund investments from U.S. government bonds into equities, real estate, or other riskier investments which might yield higher interest. We raised cautions about this throughout 2008, and our fears were proven valid by the financial crisis. In fact, Timor-Leste’s Petroleum Fund is probably the only sovereign wealth fund in the world that didn’t lose value during 2008.
Throughout 2008, we continued as one of two civil society members of the Government-Company-Civil Society-IFI Working Group on the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), with extensive coverage in our January Bulletin. As the EITI process moved along, we pushed for greater disaggregation, publication of existing Production-Sharing Contracts, and more openness and inclusion. Our advocacy was a counterweight to the oil companies’ predilection for “commercial confidentiality.”
In November, La’o Hamutuk staffer Viriato Seac, representing Timor-Leste Civil Society Organizations, attended a training on Implementing EITI: Best Practices and Tools in Berlin, Germany. This training, conducted by the EITI Secretariat and InWent, discussed how to implement EITI, especially in countries like Timor-Leste which are becoming EITI-compliant.
We continued to cooperate with groups in other countries working on revenue transparency, and to discuss these issues with Timorese and international NGOs and agencies, government officials and advisors, Petroleum Fund managers, oil company representatives and others.
Helping Timor-Leste’s government regulate company activities
Some of the most serious dangers from petroleum development do not come from mismanagement of revenues received by government, but from the profit-driven transnational petroleum industry. La’o Hamutuk works to engage oil companies and strengthen government regulation to ensure that they respect the economic, human and environmental rights of this country, as well as implementing best international principles on transparency and accountability.
During 2007, La’o Hamutuk’s advocacy helped prevent the enactment of poorly-drafted decree-laws to restructure petroleum regulation and establish a national oil company. After a few months rest, the new AMP government picked up where Fretilin had left off, and again La’o Hamutuk was the only Timorese organization to engage actively and substantively in the legislative process.
Although the Government had promised a consultation on legislation transforming the Australia-Timor-Leste Timor Sea Designated Authority (TSDA) into a National Petroleum Authority (NPA), no information was forthcoming. In May, La’o Hamutuk wrote an open letter to Secretary of State for Natural Resources urging public consultation, which was then half-heartedly granted. In one week, La’o Hamutuk submitted a 31-page analysis of the proposed law. As a result of our effort, the law was slightly amended, and passed by Decree-Law on 18 June, and the NPA opened on 1 July, although much of it is still not operational. We still believe that NPA’s lack of transparency and autonomous finances are dangerous and illegal, and reiterated this concern in submissions on the mid-year and 2009 state budgets.
In late May 2008, the TSDA (which has since become the NPA) circulated draft Technical Regulations for the Exploration and Exploitation of Petroleum in the Joint Petroleum Development Area, covering protection of health, safety, and environment. On 5 June, La’o Hamutuk submitted eleven pages of detailed review, and met with the TSDA to discuss our concerns. They circulated a revised draft, incorporating some of our recommendations, but ignoring the most important ones. The new Technical Regulations had not been approved by the end of 2008.
We were the only civil society organization to participate in a March public consultation about environmental impacts of an offshore seismic survey by the Indian oil company Reliance, providing a written submission and participating in a meeting with government and company officials. Our input resulted in some small changes to Reliance’s Environmental Management Plan. In June, the Italian company ENI proposed another seismic survey, with a brief public consultation, and La’o Hamutuk again wrote the only submission, as we had for a similar ENI survey in 2007. In both years, ENI amended its Environmental Management Plans to incorporate many of our suggestions.
In July, La’o Hamutuk participated in a three-day workshop organized by the State Secretary for Natural Resources to share perspectives on how to create strong and durable laws to regulate and develop mining in Timor-Leste. In November, the Government initiated developing a geological map of Timor-Leste, at which time traditional leaders gave permission to exploit minerals under Timor-Leste’s soil. We will continue to monitor legal and other processes related to mining.
Heavy oil power plant and national electric grid
Timor-Leste is paying nearly $400 million to a Chinese company to build three electric generating stations using imported heavy (residual) fuel oil, together with a national electric grid. The power plants are second-hand, used in China for more than two decades. This is highly polluting, difficult to manage technology which most countries have phased out. In addition to environmental and reliability concerns, project information is undisclosed and rumors abound about irregularities in tender and contracting. Secret agreements about the project started in February 2008, the first tender was issued in June, the contract signed in October, and construction started soon thereafter, without the legally-required Environmental Impact Assessment. The Prime Minister has promised that it will be operational by the end of 2009.
La’o Hamutuk began researching this project in June, when the Government advertised for the “Construction of Nationwide Electrical Power Grid and Power Plant and its Facilities.” Our website broke the issue, and it has since been picked up by many journalists and politicians, as well as civil society. Parliament removed it from the 2008 mid-year budget, but the Government exploited a technical error in the amendment to restore the funding. In the State Budget for 2009, this project is allocated 61% of Timor-Leste’s entire capital spending over the next three years.
We raised questions and objections in every available forum, including the media, our website, our Bulletin, our radio program, Parliamentary submissions and civil society coalitions. We are recruiting knowledgeable volunteers to research this in more depth, jointly with Haburas, and are building relationships with communities where the plants will be built. Virtually every independent, knowledgeable person we ask considers this project a bad idea, and La’o Hamutuk will continue to advocate for more comprehensive information, for effective pollution mitigation and avoidance, and for cleaner, more sustainable energy solutions.
UNDP commissioned La’o Hamutuk to write a Technical Background Paper for its third National Human Development Report for Timor-Leste, which will be published in 2009. Our Managing Non-Renewable Resources: Processes of Consultation Promoting Sustainable Development is the only paper by a Timorese contributor. We will publish it after UNDP finishes its report.
During 2008, the RDTL Ministry of Economy and Development wrote a State of the Nation Report reviewing various facts of Timor-Leste’s situation. La’o Hamutuk was asked to review draft chapters on Natural Resources and other sectors, and we provided comments and graphics which were incorporated into the final report.
In April 2008, U.S. Federal Judge Lynn Hughes dismissed a multi-billion dollar lawsuit brought by Oceanic Exploration (Petrotimor) and others against ConocoPhillips. The suit alleged that ConocoPhillips bribed Mari Alkatiri to prevent Petrotimor from exploring for oil in the Timor Sea. Although it received attention when it was filed in 2004, only La’o Hamutuk continued to follow the case. Six weeks after the judge’s decision, we circulated an article and created a web page to explain the process. Our release was the first anyone outside the U.S. had heard of the decision.
Throughout 2008, La’o Hamutuk added new information to our web site on all the issues discussed above. In May, we published version 4.2 of our OilWeb CD-ROM, a comprehensive source of petroleum-related information relevant to Timor-Leste and which, like our Sunrise LNG CD-ROM, is easier to access than internet in this infrastructure-deficient country.
We continue to act in solidarity with people in other countries confronting similar issues to our own. For example, in March we signed an international group letter to the president of BP about the Tangguh LNG plant in West Papua. Through meetings, email and other communications, we share information, ask questions and coordinate campaigns with a wide range of civil society, media, government agencies, petroleum companies and others. By keeping to the facts, we maintain respectful relations even with those who have different objectives.
Governance and democracy
Governance incorporates several topics: justice, security, rule of law, international influence and democracy. Much of this work uses or responds to opportunities, events and initiatives.
Our main objective is to keep the justice issue alive until an international tribunal is established to try the principal perpetrators of crimes against humanity during the 24-year Indonesian occupation of Timor-Leste. Together with other local and international movements, we give voice to the widespread popular concern that accountability is critical to effective law enforcement in Timor-Leste for the past, present and future. The lack of justice was a major contributor to crises during 2002, 2006 and 2008, and it continues to disrupt Timor-Leste as a democratic state governed under the rule of law.
Much of this work is coordinated with the Timor-Leste National Alliance for an International Tribunal (ANTI), within which La’o Hamutuk is responsible for liaison and sharing information with international solidarity and justice movements.
During 2008, we undertook the following activities:
La’o Hamutuk was elected to represent civil society to the March 2008 Timor-Leste and Development Partners Meeting. The NGO statement highlighted justice, transparency, development coordination and security. Our website is still the primary source of documents from the meeting.
Throughout 2008, Timor-Leste officials and media discussed how to get hundreds of millions of dollars from the U.S. government through the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), which assists countries who pass certain indicators measuring human rights, democracy, open economies, good governance and corruption. La’o Hamutuk asked visiting MCC officials to help develop local skills and economic capacity, in addition to building infrastructure. Throughout the year, we engaged with the U.S. Embassy and the RDTL Ministry of Finance, and we circulated relevant information, particularly to clarify the objectivity and timeliness of the indicators used by MCC. In December, the Ministry of Finance asked La’o Hamutuk staffer Charles Scheiner to speak on a panel about MCC, together with the Minister, the U.S. Ambassador, and the chair of the Parliamentary Subcommittee on Corruption. Soon thereafter, Washington decided that Timor-Leste’s declining indicator scores ruled out eligibility for MCC in 2009, and Timor-Leste is now trying for 2010.
International Stabilisation Force
Status of Forces Agreements between Australia and New Zealand and RDTL define the roles and responsibilities of foreign solders here. La’o Hamutuk continues to raise awareness regarding their activities and the impunity they enjoy for any crimes they might commit here, on or off duty.
In July we met with the International Stabilisation Force (ISF) about their late-night shooting drills off the coast of Liquiça, announced in local newspapers. We raised several concerns, including justification, community consultation and socialization, sensitivity to local trauma and feedback processes, as well as suggesting that they practice in Australia. We shared this information with peace activists and journalists, resulting in an article in the Canberra Times.
In November we made a submission regarding the ISF to an Australian Parliamentary inquiry on human rights mechanisms. We suggested improvements in the Status of Forces Agreements, accountability, compensation to victims, civil-military separation, community liaison and operational sensitivities to a traumatized population. We followed up with the Australian military itself, Australian media, the UN Association of Australia and local activists. The submission has been posted on the websites of the East Timor Law Journal and the Australian Parliament.
For many years, La’o Hamutuk has made submissions emphasizing that corruption plagues oil and gas activities everywhere, due to the large amounts of money and the secretive instincts of oil companies. We proposed open structures, transparency, checks and balances, and public accountability as essential mechanisms to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest. Unfortunately, most of our suggestions have not yet been adopted.
In September, staffer Charles Scheiner spoke on two panels at a Parliamentary conference on Strengthening the Role of Parliament in Promoting Transparency, Accountability and Combating Corruption in Timor-Leste through The Establishment of a National Network on Anti-Corruption.
Other Governance work
In February, staffer Santina Soares attended the conference Democratic Governance in Timor Leste: Reconciling the Local and the National at Charles Darwin University in Darwin Australia.
The Government’s defiance of the November Appeals Court ruling on the mid-year budget (see above) raised serious threats to the independence of the judiciary and Timor-Leste’s Constitution. La’o Hamutuk wrote an article to keep these principles in the public eye, and provided information and suggestions to journalists and others to minimize personality-based, partisan coverage of this critical issue. We helped write a statement “The Law does not only apply to small and poor people” and spoke at a press conference at the NGO Forum.
We continue to watch and engage with the United Nations Integrated Mission in Timor-Leste (UNMIT), including individual communication with staffers and officials, as well as participation in many of their meetings and conferences. La’o Hamutuk’s website includes many UN and UNMIT documents related to Timor-Leste, some of which have not been released.
During 2008, La’o Hamutuk’s work on agriculture began to focus on food sovereignty. This is different from “food security” which focuses on guaranteeing access to food without distinguishing if it is grown locally or imported.
“Food sovereignty” concentrates on local food self-sufficiency. It looks at the whole food cycle, particularly the important economic role of food. It promotes growing food locally, and explores factors that affect people’s ability to grow food, such as land rights, markets, gender, environmental sustainability, biodiversity and peasants rights. Food sovereignty is the ability of community, and the government, to decide on food policy based on their own needs, not the desires of foreign agencies or transnational corporations. We also see it as the democratization of agriculture, ensuring that farming remains a viable livelihood in Timor-Leste.
This perspective informed our work on the following topics.
During 2008, the Timor-Leste government signed four agrofuels agreements: GT Leste Biotech sugarcane Memorandum of Understanding (January), Enviroenergy Developments Australia jatropha contract (February), Jacobsen Elektro jatropha/electricity MoU (June) and KOMOR corn/jatropha MoU (August). All except Jacobsen are for export, and all involve a contribution from Timor-Leste: lease-free land, build-operate-transfer agreements, or providing money through a future “agriculture fund.” The government could also be responsible for roads, infrastructure, relocation, emergency services, importing heavy oil (for a dual fuel system) and clean-up. La’o Hamutuk found that the promised benefits to Timor-Leste, such as job creation and investment, are grossly exaggerated.
Throughout the year, we met with the Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries and the Secretary of State for Energy Policy to discuss agrofuels projects. We requested agrofuels contracts and MoUs, which we published on our website in June.
The Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries (MAF) Memorandum of Understanding with the Indonesian company GT Leste Biotech promises to develop 100,000 hectares of sugarcane plantation to create ethanol for export. This is one-sixth of all land available in Timor-Leste for food production.
When we published the GT Leste MoU, it catalyzed national and international debate. Together with other civil society groups, we lobbied for an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment; this has not happened, although a MAF representative is accompanying GT Leste’s viability study. In June we asked the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) to analyze what the government should do to ensure that this project respects laws and international conventions on housing and land rights in effect in Timor-Leste, and we helped distribute COHRE’s report to key people in government. The Ombudsman on Human Rights and Justice cited COHRE’s concerns in his October 23 finding that the project could violate land rights and was maladministered.
In November we held a public meeting on the sugarcane plantation.
During the last few years, jatropha has attracted the interest of agrofuels promoters, including those who want to do projects in Timor-Leste. Most information globally is provided by promoters and seed sellers, with little independent research about large-scale jatropha production.
La’o Hamutuk investigated a jatropha processing plant (to make oil from imported and local seeds) proposed for Carabela by Enviroenergy Developments Australia (EDA). EDA estimated their capital investment to be $550 million dollars over 10 years (more than the Timor-Leste’s non-oil GDP), which they said would create 30,000 jobs. The project includes a port, water desalination plant and jatropha refining facility. It is to be built on 59 hectares of the Carabela Industrial Development Zone and other land. We interviewed jatropha investors, farmers, community leaders and representatives in Dili, Baucau and Viqueque about EDA’s previous and proposed activities. La’o Hamutuk shared our findings through email networks and media, and provided input to Oxfam New Zealand’s jatropha position. Our November Bulletin had a cover article on jatropha – it’s now on the Aid/Watch website – and several groups distributed extra copies in the districts. We provided this report to EDA, who have declined to comment or participate in a public meeting.
We regularly update our agrofuels webpage, and it remains the principal source of primary documents, analysis and commentary on agrofuels in Timor-Leste, supporting worldwide advocacy. In 2008 we produced radio programs on jatropha, sugarcane, and alternative energy.
Our discussion and advocacy on agrofuels raises broader issues, such as export-oriented agriculture (i.e. plantations), industrial agriculture and land rights, in an effort to promote more accountable and inclusive development processes.
In June, as part of preparation for the comparative study in Brazil, La’o Hamutuk staff looked into coffee, Timor-Leste’s largest non-oil export. La’o Hamutuk did field research in Aileu and Ainaro, spoke to coffee farmers, coffee companies and donor projects, and visited coffee processing sites. We discovered positive initiatives: increasing farmers’ roles in value-adding activities, and coffee purchasers providing food on credit to farmers during the hungry season. We also found that companies didn’t report accurate prices to farmers, that river water was sometimes unusable because of dumped coffee processing waste, and that farmers knew little about international commodity markets. In August, we reported our findings to a Just Coffee (fair trade) delegation, the Australian Fair Trade and Investment Network, HASATIL and on our radio program.
Comparative Study, Brazil
In July/August La’o Hamutuk staff Inęs Martins and Yasinta Lujina undertook a four-week comparative study with the Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST), the landless workers movement in Brazil. We learned about the impacts of industrial and plantation agriculture on land rights and local agriculture systems. Inęs and Yasinta visited a sugarcane plantation, speaking with local workers and activists. Since 1970 Brazil has promoted and subsidized sugarcane for ethanol production. The expansion of sugarcane led to the widespread loss of land rights and intrusion on indigenous people. Plantation agriculture also creates poor working conditions, particularly impacting women. Chemicals, pesticides and pollution bring health problems.
Inęs and Yasinta also visited communities of landless workers occupying unused land who practice agroecological/permaculture including seed saving, organic farming and intercropping, and spoke with people from the La Via Campesina agroecological school. They learned about the landless workers movement; their structures for organizing communities, women and youth; and local and national advocacy for agricultural workers’ and land rights.
This information will inform our analysis and advocacy on agriculture issues in Timor-Leste.
We worked as part of the NGO Forum Land Rights Network to secure funding for a land law mentor to help civil society monitor land registration and land law development processes in 2009. We expanded our understanding of land rights, communicating with individuals, groups and networks in preparation for future work. We met with staff from Ita Nia Rai (the USAID funded land reform project), and participated in public information events. Our November Bulletin raised the impacts of agrofuels on land rights. In October we held a public meeting on land processes.
Throughout the year we tracked food security. We liaised with many local and international agencies, the Ministry for Agriculture and Fisheries and overseas academics. We also observed two Donor Harmonization meetings by the Ministry for Agriculture and Fisheries.
The food security situation in Timor-Leste is hard to analyze. Most people are subsistence farmers, and the food they produce never enters the market. Nobody knows how much people rely on root crops, and different areas of Timor-Leste have distinct climates, food crops and risks. Much commentary on food security is based on an industrialized agriculture perspective, not considering conflict, forced removals from land, socialization of crops such as imported rice, and propaganda campaigns for Indonesian foods. Government and international agencies focus on big investment, big infrastructure and quick fixes such as chemical fertilizers and hybrid seeds, rather than more sustainable permaculture training and community enterprise. We learned a lot about food security debates in Timor-Leste, but due to a lack of reliable current data, we could not publish reports up to La’o Hamutuk’s standards. As a result, we decided to work on food sovereignty in 2009, promoting national food self-sufficiency across the whole food system.
Climate Change is a global problem, requiring a global solution. This must be just, respecting those who have been victimized or are most vulnerable, such as, farmers, fisher folks, indigenous people and women. As a small developing country, Timor-Leste’s people will suffer the impacts of climate change, particularly because most of our people are small hold farmers. Our work regarding climate change is to disseminate information. By participating in international activities, we hope to bring alternative ideas to the adaptation and mitigation process in Timor-Leste.
In December 2007, staffers Maximus Tahu and Santina Soares attended the global UN Climate Change conference in Bali, beginning a new area for La’o Hamutuk’s work.
During 2008, we provided information on Climate Change through a public meeting, two radio programs and two Bulletin articles. Maximus Tahu attended a Climate Justice conference in Bangkok hosted by Focus on the Global South, and then met with key advocacy groups. We are active internationally through the Climate Justice Now! Network.
In March, La’o Hamutuk hosted a public meeting on alternative energy with the Secretary of State for Energy Policy.
La’o Hamutuk also attended several Permaculture Timor-Leste events and produced a radio program on Permaculture.
During 2008, we finished up projects from the previous rural development team. We published our report on the Cuban health care support for Timor-Leste in January.
In 2008 we published a critical report on the Oecusse Community Activation Program. After that, OCAP got better at sharing information, but they declined to attend the public meeting we organized in Oecussi in April. However, the meeting was attended by MAF and local officials, and the Government now is more involved in OCAP.
Much of La’o Hamutuk’s work on economics during 2008 was integrated with our work on Natural Resources, as it relates to averting the resource curse by trying to reduce dependency on petroleum revenues. Our work on the state budget is discussed above. Other economics-related work included agriculture market policy (above) and monitoring donor assistance (above).
In March 2008, many policy-makers were optimistic that petroleum revenues were the stuff that dreams are bought with, including an way to escape the regional food price spike. Following an IMF suggestion, they drafted a tax reform law to slash wage, import and business taxes by more than 60%, suggesting that the savings would relieve consumers of price increases. La’o Hamutuk, skeptical of importers’ generosity and afraid of increasing petroleum dependency, sought expert advice before presenting written and oral testimony to Parliament.
Together with the NGO Forum, we issued media statements and disseminated information through radio, public meetings, and our Bulletin. Commission C agreed with some of our recommendations, but Parliament only accepted the one not to make the tax cut retroactive, and the bill became law in June. A few months later, La’o Hamutuk’s warning that businesses, rather than consumers, would reap the benefits became sadly obvious to all, but it was too late.
To share information, strengthen advocacy and reinforce local and global civil society movements, La’o Hamutuk joins with many other organizations in international and local coalitions or networks whose focus overlaps the topics we monitor. During 2008, we worked with the following:
Core Group on Transparency
The Core Group on Transparency (CGT) formed in 2005 to monitor the RDTL state budget, and to advocate for transparency and accountability, especially regarding oil and gas revenues. The Core Group includes about 10 local NGOs, and also works with organizations and networks such as Oxfam Australia, CAFOD, Global Witness, Revenue Watch Institute and Publish What You Pay (PWYP). La’o Hamutuk is an active and well-informed member, providing research, leadership, training and coordination for the CGT and wider civil society. During 2008, La’o Hamutuk gave more than five briefings and trainings to CGT members on budget and petroleum revenue issues, and helped write coordinated submissions to Parliament during every budget cycle.
This semi-official body includes representatives from Government, oil companies, IFIs and civil society. Since 2007, La’o Hamutuk staff have been elected to represent civil society, and we continue to engage in the Working Group to push for greater transparency and accountability. The meetings build personal relationships with other petroleum sector “stakeholders,” strengthening our research and advocacy, while international EITI activities improve our knowledge about developments in other oil-producing countries.
National Alliance for an International Tribunal (ANTI)
La’o Hamutuk is one of the most active members of this coalition of Timor-Leste human rights NGOs who push to end impunity for crimes against humanity committed during the 24-year Indonesian occupation. Our work in this coalition is described above. La’o Hamutuk was re-elected to ANTI’s Board and with responsibility for liaison and advocacy with international solidarity, human rights, and justice movements.
Operating from 2001 to 2005, the Rede ba Rai network was re-established in 2008 and includes local and international NGOs in Timor-Leste. It monitors, advocates and raises awareness regarding land processes in Timor-Leste (in which many international agencies are active, including USAID, AusAid, the World Bank and the IOM). The current focus is on new land-related laws, monitoring the land registration process, and increasing public knowledge about the impacts of land reform. La’o Hamutuk takes a leading role in the legislative working group, and in formulating information and advocacy strategies.
HASATIL (Sustainable Agriculture Network)
HASATIL is a network of 38 local organizations including NGOs, community groups and the agriculture faculty of the National University of Timor-Leste, working to strengthen sustainable agriculture in Timor-Leste. In 2008, La’o Hamutuk participated in several HASATIL conferences and discussions, and we became a member in early 2009. La’o Hamutuk works with HASATIL to share information on agrofuels projects, facilitating knowledge, advocacy and coordination. La’o Hamutuk will continue to work with HASATIL to build a national movement for sustainable agriculture.
Housing Rights Network (Rede Direitu ba Uma Timor-Leste)
Rede Direitu ba Uma Timor-Leste (RDU-TL) monitors and advocates on communities’ rights regarding house confiscation, and to guarantee that nobody will be a victim of coerced evictions. This year RDU-TL issued a statement on eviction laws and wrote a submission to Parliament about solving the IDP problem. We work in sub-groups to ensure that every citizen has a right to housing and that eviction processes respect human rights. La’o Hamutuk is part of the policy monitoring and analysis group.
As discussed in the program work above, much of La’o Hamutuk’s research and advocacy relies on informal partners in other countries. The coalitions listed here are ones we relate to more formally.
Oilwatch was started in Ecuador and is now based in Nigeria, and includes organizations in tropical forest countries who are resisting oil industry activities and the underdevelopment, environmental damage and social degradation which often results. Recently, Oilwatch has emerged as a leading advocate for “climate justice” – that nations and people who benefited from activities which cause destructive climate change must take the principal responsibility to address it. La’o Hamutuk has been a member of Oilwatch since 2002, and we are active in Southeast Asia and globally.
Climate Justice Now Network
During July 2008, La’o Hamutuk staff Maximus Tahu participated in a Climate Justice Conference in Bangkok which established Climate Justice Now! Network. The CJN Network coordinates civil society groups fighting for just adaptation and mitigation on climate change, including NGOs, popular organizations, indigenous people, farmers, fishers, and people living on small islands. The Network is preparing for the upcoming United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, a key opportunity to replace the Kyoto Protocol with a fairer, more effective system.
Publish What You Pay (PWYP)
Since 2005, La’o Hamutuk has cooperated with the Publish What You Pay Coalition (PWYP) which has around 300 members around the world. This coalition urges oil and mining companies to publish their payments to governments, as a way of preventing corruption in countries rich in non-renewable resources. By relating to networks whose experience are similar to Timor-Leste’s, we improve our advocacy for Timor-Leste to implement transparency and accountability.
International solidarity and human rights organizations
La’o Hamutuk works closely with the U.S.-based East Timor and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN), the Australian Coalition for Transitional Justice in East Timor, TAPOL (U.K.), Focus on the Global South, the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, and many other organizations and coalitions which support justice and equitable development for Timor-Leste. We try to help them make their work more effective and responsive to the people of this country.
This section describes activities which La’o Hamutuk planned to do in 2008, and where we changed or were unable to fulfill our plans.
La’o Hamutuk has worked hard to recruit new local and international staff, with some success, and we continue to look for capable people. Australian Shona Hawkes joined the La’o Hamutuk team in April, focusing on agriculture and trade. Nawri Yuliana Albadro joined in July to work on economics, but after her three-month probation we decided to part ways. In September, Adino Nunes joined us to work on governance, and on the first day of 2009, Juvinal Dias became part of our natural resources team.
Some of our staffers moved on. In March, Santina Soares left for a short-term consultancy with the Sunrise Task Force, followed by a master’s course in Thailand. Tibor van Staveren finished his contract in November, and left La’o Hamutuk to be a full-time father. At year’s end, Yasinta Lujina left La’o Hamutuk to become director of Rede Feto women’s network.
We hoped to move into a new office and expand our resource center during 2008. This will provide more space for the center, making it easier for researchers to work there. Although we actively looked for a new office, including several title searches and contract negotiations, we have not yet found a satisfactory space.
We organized 15 public meetings, more than the planned ten.
We produced 35 radio programs in 2008, nearly meeting our goal of 40. Although we had hoped to be on more than three community radio stations, this has been difficult to organize, and we will continue to expand the reach of our program (now also on the internet) during 2009.
We published three Bulletins in 2008, less than our goal of five.
Our website now has much more material, is bilingual, contains audio files, and the number of readers and pages accessed has more than doubled.
Building staff capacity
Notwithstanding our research workload, we put time into enhancing staff capacity:
We finalized our Financial Policies and Internal Policies, as well as our organizational Constitution.
Although we had planned to conduct a survey on outreach and effectiveness of our publications and other outreach tools, this is being deferred until 2009, when it will be done together with an external evaluation.
In October and November, with the help of an outside facilitator, we spent about two weeks on strategic planning, identifying ways to improve our current activities and thinking about key issues for research and advocacy over the next three years. The outcomes of this process are incorporated into our 2009-2011 funding proposal, available on request
In previous years, La’o Hamutuk had problems with bookkeeping and financial reporting. During 2008 we produced a report and conducted an external financial audit for 2007. The auditor found $381 in “questioned costs,” only one-fifth of the previous year. With our new financial manager, we expect to do even better in the future. Our fundraising continues to provide enough income for the organization to operate, with support from Hivos (Netherlands), Trócaire (Ireland), Development and Peace (Canada) and project-based grants from Oxfam Australia.
During the third quarter of 2008, our internal systems identified some problematic receipts and double-billing for reimbursements. We took immediate action to limit the losses, and began an investigation which led to enforcing our “zero tolerance” policy and firing the culpable staff member in December. The amount of un-repaid misappropriated funds is under a thousand dollars, and the person involved forfeited more than $2,000 in salary and benefits.
La’o Hamutuk alone detected and documented this problem, and our Forum and Board took decisive action, demonstrating the soundness and integrity of our financial and management systems. We informed all our donors of this problem in December, offering not to use their money to cover misappropriated funds. In subsequent discussions, they all told us that La’o Hamutuk handled the problem well, given the difficulty of the situation.
During 2009, we will make some changes to our systems, including payments by check and more diligent checking of reimbursements, to guard against such things from happening again.
La’o Hamutuk’s reputation as a source of accurate, nonpartisan information and analysis is well-established. Local and international NGOs, IFIs, UN agencies, journalists, academics, donors, embassies, political parties and government agencies rely on La’o Hamutuk for facts and documents to inform their own analysis and actions.
La’o Hamutuk’s public education and advocacy on petroleum revenue management has increased awareness among organizations, political leaders and the public. Our debate and interactions with government and politicians helped inform government and parliamentary officials about sustainable management of petroleum revenue, transparency and accountability mechanisms and the dangers of petroleum dependency.
Our open letter to Natural Resources Secretary Alfredo Pires moved him to hold a public consultation prior to enactment of the National Petroleum Authority decree-law, and raised issues which continue to be debated in Parliament, the media and the courts.
Our analysis and work on the State Budgets greatly increased public and institutional understanding and discussion about revenues, sustainability, and longer-term consequences of budget decisions.
Our exposure of the problems surrounding the planned heavy oil power plants sparked a lively, wide-ranging debate in many sectors of society, as well as bringing international attention to the issue.
The quality of our work is increasingly appreciated by other institutions. Here are a few examples during 2008:
Although an international tribunal is not yet on the UN agenda, discussions continue and ANTI remains as a strong coalition. With the tenth anniversary of the terror campaign that surrounded the referendum coming up in 2009, we ready to step up local global pressure for justice.
The report of the Indonesia-Timor-Leste Truth and Friendship Commission was not as bad as some had feared, and work by ourselves and others have helped to minimize the fallout from this diplomatic effort to pre-empt accountability. The Government has largely abandoned its plants to socialize the report.
We stimulated debate in Australia and Timor-Leste on the conduct of the ISF here, and are partly responsible for the Australian military proposing a new system to compensate local residents.
Our work on the Development Partners Meeting helped bring some important issues to donors’ attention. In addition, our analysis on issues regarding the MCC and corruption helped keep the issue of genuine actions to prevent corruption, rather than symbolic gestures or prosecution of individual corruptors, in the public eye.
Our response and media discussions regarding the appeals court ruling on the mid-year budget and the government’s reaction to it helped return media and public attention to issues of democracy, not personalities.
Our report and Oecussi public meeting on the Oecussi Community Action Program (OCAP) caused OCAP to share more information with local communities, and encouraged the Ministry of Agriculture to pay more attention to OCAP.
Our circulation of several agrofuels agreements greatly expanded public awareness and debate, and has caused government officials and companies to be more careful in following the law and listening to local communities.
In 2008 we only implemented some of our plans, for two reasons:
After extensive discussion at our October Strategic Planning we decided to focus on “Food Sovereignty,” and to work with other civil society groups to build a national food sovereignty movement.
Our critique of the proposed tax reform law – that it would not reduce prices to consumers – is now widely accepted throughout Timor-Leste.Appendices (click for separate page)
The Timor-Leste Institute for Development Monitoring and Analysis (La’o Hamutuk)